Playstation 3 RSX 65nm vs PlayStation 4 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameLiverpoolRSX-CXD2991
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 November 2013 (11 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed800 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6013.20
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs7224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 58 Watt

PlayStation 4 GPU has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX 65nm, on the other hand, has 29.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PlayStation 4 GPU and Playstation 3 RSX 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
PlayStation 4 GPU
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 65nm
Playstation 3 RSX 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 393 votes

Rate PlayStation 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 26 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.