NVS 810 vs PlayStation 4 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.11
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameLiverpoolGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 November 2013 (10 years ago)4 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152512
Core clock speed800 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6033.06
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS1.058 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs7232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.11.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 November 2013 4 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 68 Watt

PlayStation 4 GPU has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

NVS 810, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 10.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PlayStation 4 GPU and NVS 810. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that PlayStation 4 GPU is a notebook card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
PlayStation 4 GPU
NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 393 votes

Rate PlayStation 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.