Radeon RX 6650M XT vs PG506-232

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.71
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed930 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate322.6309.2
Floating-point processing power10.32 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224128
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 120 Watt

PG506-232 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 37.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PG506-232 and Radeon RX 6650M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that PG506-232 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 59 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.