Radeon Instinct MI25 vs P106-100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-100 and Radeon Instinct MI25, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P106-100
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
16.61
+28.8%

P106-100 outperforms Instinct MI25 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.592.98
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP106Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speed1506 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7384.0
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs80256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz852 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s436.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P106-100 16.61
+28.8%
Instinct MI25 12.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-100 6408
+28.7%
Instinct MI25 4978

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

P106-100 36407
Instinct MI25 67679
+85.9%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

P106-100 33175
Instinct MI25 71503
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.61 12.90
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 300 Watt

P106-100 has a 28.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI25, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Radeon Instinct MI25

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 168 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.