GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs P106-090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-090 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

P106-090
2017
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.07

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms P106-090 by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P106-090 P106-090
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking581184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6526.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP106TU106B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 July 2017 (7 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed1354 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate73.49170.6
Floating-point processing power2.352 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs48144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P106-090 6.07
RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.19
+397%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-090 2342
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11646
+397%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−444%
98
+444%
1440p12−14
−400%
60
+400%
4K7−8
−457%
39
+457%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+0%
71
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+0%
73
+0%
Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
+0%
113
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 204
+0%
204
+0%
Hitman 3 81
+0%
81
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+0%
148
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 118
+0%
118
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+0%
61
+0%
Battlefield 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+0%
77
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 191
+0%
191
+0%
Hitman 3 81
+0%
81
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+0%
54
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
+0%
57
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Hitman 3 72
+0%
72
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+0%
105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+0%
51
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+0%
50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+0%
33
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 176
+0%
176
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+0%
80
+0%
Metro Exodus 72
+0%
72
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+0%
28
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+0%
20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how P106-090 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 444% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 457% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.07 30.19
Recency 31 July 2017 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt

P106-090 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 397.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-090 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P106-090 P106 090
vs
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
Arc A770M Arc A770M
P106-090 P106 090
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
ATI HD 2900 GT Radeon HD 2900 GT
vs
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
ATI X550 Radeon X550
vs
P30PH P30PH
7800 GS AGP GeForce 7800 GS AGP
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
vs
Arc Pro A50 Arc Pro A50
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670
vs
ATI HD 4670 X2 Radeon HD 4670 X2
HD 6670A Radeon HD 6670A
vs
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
Radeon VII Radeon VII
vs
HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
ATI Xpress 200 IGP Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
vs
Atari VCS 400 GPU Atari VCS 400 GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 49 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 347 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.