GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4080 Max-Q RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q RTX 4080 Ti Mobile RTX 4090 Max-Q RTX 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.46

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 839% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P102-100 P102-100
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.20no data
Power efficiency2.1141.23
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP102AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32009728
Core clock speed1582 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6515.3
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs80112
TMUs200304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB16 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P102-100 7.46
RTX 4090 Mobile 70.06
+839%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 2945
RTX 4090 Mobile 27665
+839%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−878%
176
+878%
1440p14−16
−850%
133
+850%
4K8−9
−913%
81
+913%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.28no data
1440p42.79no data
4K74.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 398
+0%
398
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Metro Exodus 148
+0%
148
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Dota 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Far Cry 5 136
+0%
136
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 387
+0%
387
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 138
+0%
138
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 262
+0%
262
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 369
+0%
369
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 516
+0%
516
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+0%
294
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 172
+0%
172
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%
World of Tanks 314
+0%
314
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 878% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 913% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.46 70.06
Recency 12 February 2018 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has a 839.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
P102-100 P102 100
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60 2Q
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU M4 8 core GPU
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Radeon 530X Radeon 530X
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7660G Radeon HD 7660G
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
R7 240 OEM Radeon R7 240 OEM
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 34 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 702 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.