GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4090 Max-Q RTX 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.64

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 843% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P102-100 P102-100
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.18no data
Power efficiency2.1041.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP102AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32009728
Core clock speed1582 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6515.3
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs80112
TMUs200304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB16 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P102-100 7.64
RTX 4090 Mobile 72.04
+843%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 2945
RTX 4090 Mobile 27760
+843%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−889%
178
+889%
1440p14−16
−857%
134
+857%
4K8−9
−925%
82
+925%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.28no data
1440p42.79no data
4K74.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 168
+0%
168
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 187
+0%
187
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 167
+0%
167
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 387
+0%
387
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 161
+0%
161
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 152
+0%
152
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 305
+0%
305
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 370
+0%
370
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120
+0%
120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 128
+0%
128
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 138
+0%
138
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 253
+0%
253
+0%
Metro Exodus 128
+0%
128
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 294
+0%
294
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156
+0%
156
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 889% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 857% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 925% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.64 72.04
Recency 12 February 2018 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has a 842.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
P102-100 P102 100
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60 2Q
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU M4 8 core GPU
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Radeon 530X Radeon 530X
vs
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7660G Radeon HD 7660G
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
R7 240 OEM Radeon R7 240 OEM
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 31 vote

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 666 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.