Quadro P2200 vs NVS 810

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 and Quadro P2200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
3.09

P2200 outperforms NVS 810 by a whopping 684% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1222.15
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM107GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speed902 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06119.4
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm201 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.06.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 810 3.09
Quadro P2200 24.23
+684%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1190
Quadro P2200 9335
+684%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 24.23
Recency 4 November 2015 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 810 has 10.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 684.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 365 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.