ATI Rage Fury vs NVS 5400M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking954not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.20no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGF108Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 August 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed660 MHz80 MHz
Number of transistors585 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.560.16
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs162

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz120 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s960.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 250 nm

NVS 5400M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5400M and Rage Fury. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation card while Rage Fury is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
ATI Rage Fury
Rage Fury

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 45 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Rage Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.