Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVS 510

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking920not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency3.56no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK107G80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)5 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192128
Core clock speed797 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate12.7538.40
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS0.3686 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length160 mm312 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 171 Watt

NVS 510 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 388.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 510 and Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 60 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.