GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVS 2100M

Place in the ranking	1279	201
Place by popularity	not in top-100	24
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	76.17
Power efficiency	2.24	27.17
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GT218	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	2304
Core clock speed	535 MHz	1042 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1470 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.280	105.8
Floating-point processing power	0.03936 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	8	72
Tensor Cores	no data	72
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.64 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.2	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 2100M 0.36

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.74
+7606%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M 139

RTX 3050 6 GB 10689
+7590%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−7400%

150−160

+7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −7567%	230−240 +7567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −7400%	600−650 +7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −7579%	2150−2200 +7579%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −7567%	230−240 +7567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −7400%	600−650 +7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −7122%	650−700 +7122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −7579%	2150−2200 +7579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −7567%	230−240 +7567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −7400%	600−650 +7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −7122%	650−700 +7122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −7579%	2150−2200 +7579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −7400%	450−500 +7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−7400%

150−160

+7400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−7400%

150−160

+7400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	27.74
Recency	7 January 2010	2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	70 Watt

NVS 2100M has 536.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 7605.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.