GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB vs NVS 2100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT218GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed535 MHz1265 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors260 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate4.280118.4
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs448
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12.0
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.26.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 27 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 80 Watt

NVS 2100M has 627.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 2100M and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 71 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.