Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5850
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.91

Iris Xe MAX Graphics outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking909626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.3814.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBroadwayDG1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800768
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0079.20
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−163%
50−55
+163%
Full HD23
−17.4%
27
+17.4%
1440p7−8
−186%
20
+186%
4K5−6
−220%
16
+220%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Elden Ring 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−290%
39
+290%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1050%
23
+1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−313%
33
+313%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6
+20%
Dota 2 4−5
−575%
27
+575%
Elden Ring 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−123%
29
+123%
Fortnite 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−230%
33
+230%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−126%
40−45
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
World of Tanks 35−40
−127%
80−85
+127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Dota 2 4−5
−850%
38
+850%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−223%
42
+223%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−190%
29
+190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−126%
40−45
+126%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−154%
30−35
+154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
World of Tanks 12−14
−208%
35−40
+208%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 8−9
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Valorant 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Elden Ring 0−1 3−4
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−25%
20
+25%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Fortnite 0−1 4−5
Valorant 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 29
+0%
29
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 11
+0%
11
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 163% faster in 900p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 17% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 186% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 220% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 48 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 5.13
Recency 7 January 2010 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 168.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 272 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.