GeForce MX230 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.11
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMadisonGP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)21 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400256
Core clock speed550 MHz1519 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1582 MHz
Number of transistors627 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate11.0025.31
Floating-point processing power0.44 TFLOPS0.81 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 21 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX230 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 5750 and GeForce MX230. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
Mobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1374 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.