GeForce Go 7800 GTX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Place in performance ranking	973	1185
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	G7x (2005−2007)
GPU code name	Madison Pro	G70M
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	29 September 2005 (18 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	32
Core clock speed	450 MHz	8 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	440 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	302 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15-19 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	10.56
Floating-point performance	360.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and GeForce Go 7800 GTX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	35.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Full HD	17 +183%	6−7 −183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and Go 7800 GTX compete in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 200% faster in 900p
ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 5650 is ahead in 31 test (89%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.37	0.54
Recency	7 January 2010	29 September 2005
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has a 153.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.