Quadro T2000 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Place in the ranking	1099	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.05	23.83
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	M96	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	1024
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	114.2
Floating-point processing power	0.32 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4650 1.04

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+1897%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 4650 401

T2000 Mobile 7985
+1891%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1775%

300−350
+1775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	65−70
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −683%	45−50 +683%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	65−70
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%
Fortnite	4−5 −2625%	100−110 +2625%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1050%	130−140 +1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −683%	45−50 +683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
World of Tanks	24−27 −883%	230−240 +883%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	65−70
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1050%	130−140 +1050%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2767%	170−180 +2767%
World of Tanks	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1040%	55−60 +1040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Valorant	6−7 −800%	50−55 +800%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −1967%	60−65 +1967%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	0−1	27−30
Valorant	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4650 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 1775% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 2767% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (61%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.04	20.77
Recency	9 January 2009	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4650 has 71.4% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1897.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.