GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1093not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameM96GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed500 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors514 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate16.004.160
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

210 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 12.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 91 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 73 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.