GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

Place in the ranking	1288	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.41
Power efficiency	no data	24.82
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M92	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	7168
Core clock speed	680 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.440	554.4
Floating-point processing power	0.1088 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	80
TMUs	8	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −22500%	226 +22500%
1440p	0−1	141
4K	-0−1	88

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.65
1440p	no data	4.25
4K	no data	6.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−19900%

400−450
+19900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5200%	150−160 +5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −19900%	400−450 +19900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3375%	270−280 +3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −8325%	300−350 +8325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5200%	150−160 +5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −19900%	400−450 +19900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3375%	270−280 +3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −10600%	428 +10600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1800%	170−180 +1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5200%	150−160 +5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −19900%	400−450 +19900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3375%	270−280 +3375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9425%	381 +9425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2133%	201 +2133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −396%	139 +396%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −1800%	110−120 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −10200%	200−210 +10200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6050%

120−130
+6050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −6600%	65−70 +6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4400%

90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	265 +0%	265 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	154 +0%	154 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hitman 3	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	133 +0%	133 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	132 +0%	132 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 +0%	62 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4570 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 22500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 10600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.35	78.29
Recency	9 January 2009	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 22268.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.