HD Graphics P4600 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4330 with HD Graphics P4600, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4330
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.33

HD Graphics P4600 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4330 by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300967
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.29
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameM92Haswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80160
Core clock speed450 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors242 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data84 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60024.00
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 1.57
Recency 9 January 2009 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 22 nm

HD Graphics P4600 has a 375.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4330 is a notebook card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 47 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 35 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.