GeForce 9200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking850not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.40no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM88C79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed660 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors666 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate10.563.600
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed850 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2008 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 40 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200, on the other hand, has 175% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is a notebook card while GeForce 9200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.