Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI Mobility HD 3850

Place in the ranking	1174	61
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	55.86
Power efficiency	1.34	18.16
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M88	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	4 June 2008 (16 years ago)	13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	3072
Core clock speed	580 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	666 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.280	499.2
Floating-point processing power	0.3712 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	16	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−6900%

210−220

+6900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −7150%	290−300 +7150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −6567%	400−450 +6567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −7067%	2150−2200 +7067%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −7150%	290−300 +7150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −6567%	400−450 +6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −6900%	700−750 +6900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −7067%	2150−2200 +7067%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −7150%	290−300 +7150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −6567%	400−450 +6567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −6900%	700−750 +6900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −7067%	2150−2200 +7067%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−6900%

70−75
+6900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −6567%	400−450 +6567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −6900%	210−220 +6900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −6900%	140−150 +6900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−6900%

210−220

+6900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −6900%	70−75 +6900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−6900%

140−150

+6900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.68	49.84
Recency	4 June 2008	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	190 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3850 has 442.9% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 7229.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.