UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3670
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.44

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3670 by a whopping 880% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1243677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameM86Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (16 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12032
Core clock speed680 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.440no data
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−300%
16
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−200%
12
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+0%
9
+0%
Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
+0%
4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 3670 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 17 tests (30%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (70%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 4.31
Recency 7 January 2008 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 879.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 21 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.