ATI Radeon 9200 vs ATI Mobility HD 3650

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 with Radeon 9200, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 3650
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.36
+3500%

ATI Mobility HD 3650 outperforms ATI 9200 by a whopping 3500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12861517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.820.02
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameM86RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed500 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors378 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001.000
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.01
Recency 7 January 2008 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 28 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has a 3500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 39 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 50 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.