Quadro FX 770M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM86G96
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2008 (16 years ago)14 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12032
Core clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors378 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0008.000
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 14 August 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

FX 770M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and Quadro FX 770M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 39 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.