ATI Xenos vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RV6xx (2008−2010) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | no data | Xenos |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 August 2010 (14 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 240 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 232 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 90 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 9.0c (9_3) |
| OpenGL | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3400 and Xenos. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is a notebook card while Xenos is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
