Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RV6xx (2008−2010) | Gen. 4 (2007−2010) |
| GPU code name | no data | Pineview |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 August 2010 (14 years ago) | 10 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 123 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 45 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
