ATI Radeon 8500 vs ATI Mobility HD 2600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1499
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.06
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameM76R200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed500 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors390 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0002.200
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 2600 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2600 and Radeon 8500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is a notebook card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
ATI Radeon 8500
Radeon 8500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 38 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 98 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.