RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.95
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM72no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403072
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.