GeForce Go 7400T vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRS300G72
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 June 2003 (21 year ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors76 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Texture fill rate0.61.800
ROPs22
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.42.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2003 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm

Go 7400T has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP and GeForce Go 7400T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7400T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400T
GeForce Go 7400T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 11 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.