RTX A2000 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.84
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameM9GA106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2002 (22 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores52560
Core clock speed240 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed240 MHz1358 MHz
Number of transistors36 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate0.96108.6
Floating-point processing powerno data6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2002 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 and RTX A2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Mobility Radeon 9000
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 92 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.