ATI Graphics Xpression vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameM9Mach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2002 (22 years ago)1 November 1995 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed240 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed240 MHzno data
Number of transistors36 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm600 nm
Texture fill rate0.96no data
ROPs41
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDREDO
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.1N/A
OpenGL1.4N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2002 1 November 1995
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 600 nm

ATI Mobility 9000 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 and Graphics Xpression. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 is a notebook card while Graphics Xpression is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Mobility Radeon 9000
ATI Graphics Xpression
Graphics Xpression

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Graphics Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.