ATI Radeon X1800 GTO vs ATI Mobility 7500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.52
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameM7R520
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 December 2001 (22 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed280 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed280 MHzno data
Number of transistors60 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate0.566.000
ROPs112
TMUs212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz495 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s31.68 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2001 1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 48 Watt

ATI Mobility 7500 has 77.8% lower power consumption.

ATI X1800 GTO, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 7500 and Radeon X1800 GTO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 7500 is a notebook card while Radeon X1800 GTO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon 7500
Mobility Radeon 7500
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
Radeon X1800 GTO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon X1800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.