Radeon RX 6650M vs ATI Mobility FireGL 9000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.64
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameM9Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2002 (22 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51792
Core clock speed250 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors36 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000270.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RX 6650M has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL 9000 and Radeon RX 6650M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL 9000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6650M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL 9000
Mobility FireGL 9000
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 94 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.