RTX A4500 Mobile vs ATI Mobility FireGL 7800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated76
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.50
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameM7GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date29 September 2001 (23 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25888
Core clock speed280 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed280 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors60 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate0.56276.0
Floating-point processing powerno data17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs2184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2001 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 140 Watt

ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 has 418.5% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility FireGL 7800 and RTX A4500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.