Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Matrox QID PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.14
ArchitectureMP (2004)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameMP-A4Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2004 (19 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed250 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1499 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology0 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000239.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.675 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 4.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2004 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Matrox QID PRO and Radeon Pro 5700 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox QID PRO is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox QID PRO
QID PRO
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.