Quadro T1000 vs Matrox Parhelia APVe

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.25
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameParhelia-512TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 June 2006 (18 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors80 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112.0 (12_1)
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Matrox Parhelia APVe 5
Quadro T1000 6452
+128940%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2006 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

Quadro T1000 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia APVe and Quadro T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia APVe is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia APVe
Parhelia APVe
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 371 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.