Radeon Pro V520 vs Matrox Millennium G550

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.82
ArchitectureG500 (2001−2005)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameCondorNavi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 November 2001 (22 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed125 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors10 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2001 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

Pro V520 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Millennium G550 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Millennium G550 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Millennium G550
Millennium G550
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.