ROG Ally Extreme GPU vs Matrox G450 x4 MMS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG400 (1999−2002)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCondorPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2001 (23 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed125 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors10 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Length168 mm280 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MBps1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2001 13 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm

ROG Ally Extreme GPU has an age advantage of 22 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox G450 x4 MMS and ROG Ally Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS
AMD ROG Ally Extreme GPU
ROG Ally Extreme GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate ROG Ally Extreme GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.