Radeon R7 250E vs Jetson Xavier NX GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.09
Power efficiencyno data5.45
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGV10BCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)20 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed854 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1377 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,000 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate33.0525.60
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432
Tensor Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA7.2-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 20 December 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Jetson Xavier NX GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Xavier NX GPU and Radeon R7 250E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Xavier NX GPU is a notebook card while Radeon R7 250E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX GPU
Jetson Xavier NX GPU
AMD Radeon R7 250E
Radeon R7 250E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1
29 votes

Rate Jetson Xavier NX GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
23 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Xavier NX GPU or Radeon R7 250E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.