RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Jetson TX2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP10BAD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2016 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2566144
Core clock speed1300 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length87 mm168 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed3.7 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth59.71 GB/s280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA6.28.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Jetson TX2 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson TX2 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson TX2 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson TX2
Jetson TX2
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 7 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.