RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Jetson TX1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated29
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.55
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM20BAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2015 (9 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2566144
Core clock speed998 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate15.97417.6
Floating-point processing power0.511 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA5.38.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2015 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 20 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 130 Watt

Jetson TX1 has 2066.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson TX1 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson TX1 is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Jetson TX1
Jetson TX1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Jetson TX1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.