Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameDG1Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681152
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate79.2057.60
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs4872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4IGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1*
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 7 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.