A800 PCIe 40 GB vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.25no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG1GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 October 2020 (4 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686912
Core clock speedno data765 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate79.20609.1
Floating-point processing power2.534 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs24160
TMUs48432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed4.3 GB/s1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s1,555 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 October 2020 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 900% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics MAX and A800 PCIe 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 40 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 40 GB
A800 PCIe 40 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 208 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A800 PCIe 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.