ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Radeon 9200 Radeon 9200 SE Radeon 9250 Radeon 9250 PCI

Contents

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
ATI 9200 SE 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4811534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.74no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27no data
1440p16no data
4K11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 15 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 15 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 38 no data
Forza Horizon 5 22 no data
Metro Exodus 29 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 17 no data
Valorant 26 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11 no data
Dota 2 28 no data
Far Cry 5 31 no data
Fortnite 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 17 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data
World of Tanks 96 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10 no data
Dota 2 47 no data
Far Cry 5 34 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 no data
Valorant 23 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 no data
World of Tanks 65−70 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 19 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 8 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 20 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Fortnite 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 11 no data
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 no data
Valorant 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 15 August 2020 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
ATI 9200 SE Radeon 9200 SE
vs
R4 Graphics Radeon R4 Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
R9 M390X Radeon R9 M390X
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
vs
Volari V8
RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
A100 SXM4 A100 SXM4
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
GTX 1650 TU116 GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max Q
RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
vs
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
RTX 3070 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
P106M P106M
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
HD 8400 Radeon HD 8400
RX 6900 XTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X 6900 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 1000 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.