Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459not rated
Place by popularity88not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data192.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 200 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 910 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.