Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	525	not rated
Place by popularity	48	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.84	no data
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	RDNA 3+
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	128
Core clock speed	400 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

+

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

12_2

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---