Matrox Marvel G400-TV vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking522not rated
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency18.72no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeToucan
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed400 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data10 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.25
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data16 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_16.0
OpenGLno dataNone
OpenCLno dataNone
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 20 May 1999
Chip lithography 10 nm 250 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has an age advantage of 21 year, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and Matrox Marvel G400-TV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook card while Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 896 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.