GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Iris Xe Graphics G4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.25
Power efficiencyno data2.99
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT2GK110B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)10 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed300 MHz863 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40173.2
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS4.156 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs24192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2020 10 September 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Xe Graphics G4 and GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 209 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.