Radeon Pro V520 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 with Radeon Pro V520, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014
15 Watt
4.21

Pro V520 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 654% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking677170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.529.82
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eNavi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40230.4
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.21
Pro V520 31.76
+654%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1625
Pro V520 12257
+654%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.21 31.76
Recency 5 September 2014 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has a 654.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro V520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.