Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014
15 Watt
4.14
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+558%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking684200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.0853.84
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed300 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40129.6
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs632
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.14 27.26
Recency 5 September 2014 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 558.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 14 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.