Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

Place in the ranking	651	81
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	78.27
Power efficiency	22.03	16.26
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code name	Skylake GT4e	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	2048
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.40	352.6
Floating-point processing power	1.094 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	9	64
TMUs	72	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 4.65

RX 7600 XT 43.47
+835%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 1841

RX 7600 XT 17215
+835%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−795%

170−180
+795%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

1.94

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −833%	140−150 +833%
Valorant	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Dota 2	5 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −817%	220−230 +817%
Fortnite	27−30 −829%	260−270 +829%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −833%	140−150 +833%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −754%	350−400 +754%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −833%	140−150 +833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Valorant	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
World of Tanks	75−80 −786%	700−750 +786%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Dota 2	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −817%	220−230 +817%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −754%	350−400 +754%
Valorant	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −806%	290−300 +806%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
World of Tanks	30−35 −782%	300−310 +782%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Valorant	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Dota 2	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Fortnite	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Valorant	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 580 and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 795% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.65	43.47
Recency	1 September 2015	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1166.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 834.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.